By Doug Austin
\r\n
In Electrified Discounters, Inc. v. MI Technologies, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:13cv1332 (RNC) (D. Conn. May 19, 2015), Connecticut Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez granted the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff ‘s responses to discovery and ordered the plaintiff to “image its sources of electronically stored information (‘ESI’), including its hard drives and QuickBook files”.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In this trademark infringement case between competitors who sell replacement…
Related Stories
- Court Resolves Dispute Over Scope of Databases and Searches to be Performed: eDiscovery Case Law
- New York Supreme Court Sanctions Two Attorney Defendants for “Egregious Misconduct” in Spoliation of Data: eDiscovery Case Law
- When Collecting Emails, Make Sure You Have a Complete Outlook: eDiscovery Best Practices