By Doug Austin
\r\n
In Grove City Veterinary Service, LLC et. al. v. Charter Practices International, LLC, 13-02276 (Aug. 18, 2015), Oregon Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta concluded that the plaintiffs had not met their burden of showing they are entitled to sanctions for spoliation of evidence by deleting one of the veterinarian’s archived work emails.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In this breach of contract case between veterinarians and a veterinary hospital, during discovery for this case, one of the plaintiffs was…
Related Stories
- Defendant Gets Summary Judgment, Not Dismissal, Due to Plaintiff’s Wiping of Hard Drive: eDiscovery Case Law
- Court Rules that State Agency is Not Responsible for Emails Deleted via the Retention Policy of Another State Agency: eDiscovery Case Law
- Believe it or Not, Apple v. Samsung is Still Going Strong: eDiscovery Case Law