By Doug Austin
\r\n
In Prezio Health, Inc. v. Schenk, et. al., No. 13-1463 (D. Conn., Sept. 9, 2015), after “a careful in camera review” of emails responsive to eighteen keyword search terms, Connecticut Magistrate Judge Joan Glazer Margolis ordered the defendant to produce metadata for eight specific emails which had already been produced to the plaintiff.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In this dispute over a non-compete provision, the plaintiff provided a list of 18 search terms to be used in searching the defendants’…
Read the whole entry… »
-
Doug Austin is the editor and founder of eDiscovery Today and an EDRM Global Advisory Council Leader.
Doug is an established eDiscovery thought leader with over 30 years of experience providing eDiscovery best practices, legal technology consulting and technical project management services to numerous commercial and government clients.
Doug has published a daily blog since 2010 and has written numerous articles and white papers. He has received the JD Supra Readers Choice Award as the Top eDiscovery Author for 2017 and 2018 and a JD Supra Readers Choice Award as a Top Cybersecurity Author for 2019.
View all posts
