By Doug Austin
\r\n
In SFP Works, LLC v. Buffalo Armory, LLC, No. 14-13575 (E.D. Mich., Nov. 19, 2015), Michigan Chief District Judge Gerald E. Rosen, agreeing with the defendant that the plaintiff’s motion was untimely, and that Plaintiff “unreasonably declined” several options proposed by the defendant for accessing the data that was produced to it by the defendant, denied the plaintiff’s motion to compel access to operational data.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In this patent infringement case, the defendant…
Related Stories
- Court Denies Plaintiff’s Request for In Camera Review of Defendants’ Privileged Emails: eDiscovery Case Law
- Defendant Ordered to Produce Unredacted Versions of Agreements and Shipment Data: eDiscovery Case Law
- Appellate Court Upholds Ruling to Require Production in Native Format: eDiscovery Case Law