By Doug Austin
\r\n
In Malibu Media, LLC v. Tashiro, Case No. 13-cv-00205 -WTL-MJD (S.D. Ind. May 18, 2015), Indiana Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore issued a Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions, recommending that the Court grant the plaintiff’s motion against the defendants for spoliation of evidence and perjury and enter default judgment against the defendants.
\r\n
Case Background
\r\n
In 2013, the plaintiff retained a German company to investigate whether certain internet users were…
Related Stories
- New York Supreme Court Sanctions Two Attorney Defendants for “Egregious Misconduct” in Spoliation of Data: eDiscovery Case Law
- Plaintiff Ordered to Image its Sources of ESI, Respond to Disputed Discovery Requests: eDiscovery Case Law
- Court’s “Jazzy” Decision to Award Costs May “Bug” Plaintiff, But Defendant Doesn’t Mind a “Bit”: eDiscovery Case Law
