By Doug Austin
\r\n
On Monday, we covered a case where the requesting party objected to receiving a native format production by the opposing party instead of TIFF files (go figure). In today’s case, it was the producing party that objected to providing a native format production. Here’s the case.
\r\n
In the case In re State Farm Lloyds, No. 13-14-00616 (Tx. App. Ct., Oct. 28, 2015), the Texas Court of Appeals, finding that the relator failed to meet its burden to support its objection that it could not produce…
Related Stories
- Court Denies Defendant’s Motion to Require Plaintiff to Re-Produce Data in a More Usable Format: eDiscovery Case Law
- Court Finds No Discovery Abuses by Defendant that Produced MSG Instead of TIFF Files: eDiscovery Case Law
- Defendant’s Wife Ordered to Turn Over iPhone for Examination: eDiscovery Case Law
